The False Promise of Going Off-Grid

The False Promise of Going Off-Grid

Privacy advocates are always looking for alternatives to banking, but most of the alternatives are actually even worse.

The False Promise of Going Off-Grid

This is Part 2 of a 3 part series on financial privacy. You can read Part 1 here. Make sure to sign up to get Part 3 delivered straight to your inbox.

Sign up

Last week, I highlighted the risks of traditional financial institutions and why us privacy enthusiasts are always keeping an eye out for better alternatives. I pointed out that Know Your Customer (KYC) laws enable the potential for abuses, including but not limited to:

  • Data breaches
  • Data sharing
  • Financial censorship

Unfortunately the alternatives to a traditional financial institution are limited and arguably worse.

There are technically a myriad of alternatives to traditional big-name banks, but many of them - like credit unions or online-only banks - fail to adequately our earlier privacy concerns.

At the end of the day I think the two "lowest common denominators" are cryptocurrency and cash.

Some of the alternatives I found in my research are just cash or cryptocurrency with extra steps, like prepaid cards, stablecoins, or precious metals.

While I am a proponent of both cash and cryptocurrency, I believe they're both poor substitutes for long-term places to store the bulk of your wealth.

Here's why.

This post is for paying subscribers only

Unlock access and see the entire library of paid-members only posts.

Sign up now

Already a member? Sign in

You might also like